Complete Definition of International Relations
Understanding International Relations, Theories, Concepts and Principles are an academic field and public policy and can be positive or normative because International Relations seeks to analyze and formulate foreign policy of countries.
Definition of international relations. International Relations, a branch of political science, is a study of foreign issues and global issues among countries in the international system, including the role of states, intergovernmental organizations, nongovernmental organizations or nongovernmental organizations society, and multinational companies.
International Relations is an academic and public policy field and can be positive or normative because International Relations seeks to analyze and formulate the foreign policy of certain countries.
In addition to political science, International Relations uses various fields of science such as economics, history, law, philosophy, geography, sociology, anthropology, psychology, cultural studies in its studies. HI covers a wide range of issues, from globalization and its impacts on societies and state sovereignty to ecological sustainability, nuclear proliferation, nationalism, economic development, terrorism, organized crime, the safety of humanity, and human rights (Jennyan Rychan on “Managing Effect of Culture on Gender Inequality”.
International Relations is a process of human interaction that occurs between nations to achieve a goal. The relationship can be an interaction between individuals (for example tourists, students, and also foreign workers); among groups (for example are social institutions, as well as trade); or also relations between countries (for example, are countries which establish an economic, defense, security, social, cultural, or even state relationship) that form international organizations such as the United Nations History or also ASEAN).
International relations theory. What was explicitly recognized as a theory of international relations was not developed until after World War I, and is discussed in more detail below.
However, HI theory has a long tradition of using the work of other social sciences. The use of capital letters "H" and "I" in international relations aims to distinguish the discipline of International Relations from the phenomenon of international relations.
Many people cite Thucydides' Peloponnesian War History as inspiration for realist theory, with Hobbes's Leviathan and Machiavelli's The Prince providing further development. Likewise, liberalism uses Kant and Rousseau's work, with Kant's work often cited as the first development of the Democratic Peace Theory. Although contemporary human rights are significantly different from the types of rights coveted in natural law, Francisco de Vitoria, Hugo Grotius, and John Locke make the first statements about the right to obtain certain rights based on humanity in general. In the 20th century, besides contemporary theories of liberal internationalism, Marxism was the cornerstone of international relations.
Epistemology Theory and HI theory. Main Theories of International Relations Realism Neorealism Idealism Liberalism Neoliberalism Marxism Dependency Theory Critical Theory Constructionvism Functionalism Neofunctionalism Broadly speaking HI theories can be divided into two epistemological views "positivist" and "post-positivist".
Positivist theories aim at replicating the methods of social sciences by analyzing the impact of material forces. These theories usually focus on various aspects such as the interaction of countries, measures of military forces, balance of power and others. Post-positivist epistemology rejects the idea that the social world can be studied in an objective and value-free way.
This epistemology rejects central ideas about neo-realism / liberalism, such as rational choice theory, on the grounds that the scientific method cannot be applied to the social world and that a HI "science" is impossible.
The key difference between the two views is that while positivist theories, such as neo-realism, offer a variety of causal explanations (such as why and how power is applied), post-positivist post-positivist theories focus on constitutive questions, for example what is meant by "power"; what are the things that shape it, how power is experienced and how power is reproduced. Post-positive theories explicitly often promote a normative approach to HI, taking into account ethics.
This is something that is often overlooked in "traditional" HI because positivist theories make the difference between "facts" and normative judgments, or "values". During the late 1980s / 1990s the debate between supporters of positivist theories and supporters of post-positivist theories became the dominant debate and was called the Third "Biggest Debate" (Lapid 1989.) Post-structuralist theories